Director of the
Dear Mr. President of the
I am writing to you to share my observations on the current situation in the sphere of observance of the rule of law in the country.
Criminal proceedings in
We got acquainted with the motives and reasons for initiating criminal cases against politicians and came to the conclusion that the appearance of combating crime is created. You are reported, creating an appearance, but not reporting on a real fight at all.
There are absolutely no legitimate legal arguments in the case on charges of the deputy Aida Salyanova on the illegal licensing of the citizen Aleksey Yeliseyev.
This criminal case was initiated on the events of 2010, when Aida Salyanova held the post of acting Minister of Justice and issued an order to renew the validity of the lawyer license to Yeliseyev. At that time, there were no restrictions for renewal of the license, since its owner wasn’t convicted. Aleksey Yeliseyev was convicted by the
Moreover, the lack of professionalism of the investigation is manifested in the fact that events are described regarding Yeliseyev, including his activities in a foreign country, but conclusions are made regarding Aida Salyanova.
The rules of formal logic that the investigation must comply with are violated, and the prosecution didn’t bother to argue about the damage done to the state or the benefit received by someone.
The investigating authorities believe that since a criminal case was initiated against Yeliseyev, the Ministry of Justice had no right to renew the license. The Ministry of Justice received inquiries about Yeliseyev’s activities, but there was no question of revoking the license. The Ministry of Justice was guided by the principle of the presumption of innocence.
Article 26 of the Constitution states that «everyone is presumed innocent of the commission of a crime until his guilt is proven in the manner prescribed by law and established by a final judicial decision.»
This principle doesn’t allow restricting the rights of any citizen until he is convicted by a court. We don’t defend Aleksey Yeliseyev, but we consider it important to comply with all the requirements of the law and the Constitution.
Any official of the Ministry of Justice is obliged to resume the license for advocacy for a person who hasn’t been convicted by a court yet, otherwise political expediency is placed above the law and we can slide down to an authoritarian style of government.
The deputy of the parliament Omurbek Tekebayev was convicted by the court only on the application of the citizen of the
This method can be accused without proof of any civil servant and limit it in freedom. In this case, a dangerous precedent is created. But after all, our republic is sovereign and can’t indulge every foreign citizen, because we need irrefutable evidence in the commission of illegal actions.
It is impossible to imagine that, on the application of our citizen, a citizen of a country can easily be taken into custody, for example, a deputy of the State Duma or the Kazakh Majilis.Nurlan Sadykov
In this case, the principle of a sovereign legal state must operate, which presupposes independence in foreign policy and independence in domestic politics.
An opposition deputy Almambet Shykmamatov is accused of illegally holding a tender for the sale of the car, but there is no signature in the tender documents, and Shykmamatov de jure wasn’t the owner of the car sold at the contest. And in this case, the accusation looks strained and engaged.
Our fears are connected not only with ridiculous accusations of representatives of the parliamentary opposition, but also with the disbelief of the society in the triumph of justice in the judiciary.
Your statements about significant financial injections into the judicial system are in no way consistent with justice in the judicial system. Courts haven’t yet become a bulwark of democracy and, as you yourself noted at the ceremonial meeting of the Judicial Reform Council, there is still much to be done in reforming the courts.
Unfortunately, the fight against corruption has become selective. Campaigns are conducted, but there is no deep, systematic identification of all the causes that generate it.
There is a struggle against corruption, but there is no system of preventing it by administrative methods, which are sometimes more effective than combating criminal consequences.
Dear President of Kyrgyzstan, your environment reports on the struggle, but doesn’t see any ways and measures to prevent corruption. We can’t ask you to put pressure on the court, but the president always consults with the attorney general, who can correct the mistakes made by the investigation.Nurlan Sadykov
This year you resign your powers and should leave a trace in the history of
Nurlan Sadykov, Director of the Institute for Constitutional Policy, August 18, 2017.